Just more philosophy

"Clearly, the investigation of philosophical methodology cannot and should not be philosophically neutral. It is just more philosophy, turned on philosophy itself." - Timothy Williamson

torstai 1. lokakuuta 2015

Metaphilosophical arguments are futile

"Some of our authors suspect that a change in [methodological] opinion within philosophy will not be attainable through sophisticated arguments, though, but only by the continual retirement of traditional philosophers." (Christoph Luetge, Hannes Rusch, and Matthias Uhl, eds: Experimental Ethics: Toward an Empirical Moral Philosophy, 2014)
Lähettänyt Narpac klo 8.33
Kohteen lähettäminen sähköpostitseBloggaa tästä!Jaa X:ssäJaa FacebookiinJaa Pinterestiin

Ei kommentteja:

Lähetä kommentti

Uudempi teksti Vanhempi viesti Etusivu
Tilaa: Lähetä kommentteja (Atom)

Tietoja minusta

Narpac
Tarkastele profiilia

Blogiarkisto

  • ►  2016 (1)
    • ►  marraskuuta (1)
  • ▼  2015 (36)
    • ▼  lokakuuta (13)
      • The end
      • An improved version of The Principle of Naturalist...
      • How to judge a philosophy paper without reading it
      • Who needs therapy when we have science? (Or, why 1...
      • Why metaphilosophy should always come before philo...
      • Never questioning the value of philosophy is unphi...
      • How to reduce all philosophical questions to empir...
      • Philosophy of science is just as bad as analytic m...
      • Should we democratize philosophy?
      • Metaphilosophical arguments are futile
      • Philosophers are bad at formulating questions and ...
      • It is wrong everywhere, always, and for anyone to ...
      • A metaphysician admits to using intuitions as evid...
    • ►  syyskuuta (23)
Teema: Yksinkertainen. Sisällön tarjoaa Blogger.